THE SONGS · ENTRY 04 OF 05

Every catalogue has one: the song that gets a pass because the band is good, because the album around it is decent, because nobody wants to be the person who names it. This is that article. The song in question is "We're Not Getting Any Younger" from Modern Artillery (2003), and the argument here is that it fails not in spite of what the band does well but because of exactly what they do well — its weaknesses are structural, and the structure is load-bearing.
Start with what the song is trying to do. It reaches for anthemic, which is a legitimate ambition for a rock three-piece with a tight following and real live momentum behind it. The chorus is designed to be sung back from the floor. The title phrase is the kind of rallying-cry shorthand that has fuelled a hundred bar-room singalongs. None of that is wrong in principle. The problem is that the band arrives at the chorus having done very little to earn it.
The verse melody sits in a narrow range, staying close enough to the root that it never generates the tension the chorus needs to release. In a band where guitar tone does all the harmonic heavy lifting — where a hollow-body instrument in a power trio has to fill frequency space that a rhythm guitarist would normally occupy — a low-energy verse isn't a slow build, it's a deficit. By the time the chorus lands, there's no accumulated pressure behind it. It lands flat.
Compare this to how the band handles the same structural problem on a song that works. "Second Solution," from the band's debut era, uses the verse to tighten the coil: the riff is kinetic, the vocal phrasing cuts across the bar line, so the chorus arrives as release of real stored energy. "We're Not Getting Any Younger" skips that step. The chorus asks you to feel something the song hasn't yet given you a reason to feel.
The double bass makes this worse. The slap pattern in the verse is correct in technique and misapplied in function. Slap against an upright isn't just a sound, it's a percussive decision that raises the room temperature and implies forward motion. Used in a low-melody verse, it creates a mismatch — the bass is playing a higher urgency than the guitar and vocal can match. The three-piece format has no fourth instrument to paper over the disagreement. What you hear is a rhythm section that has arrived at the chorus already, waiting for a song that hasn't got there yet.
The lyric is the third problem, and worth noting even without reproducing it. The phrase "we're not getting any younger" is doing the rhetorical work of an insight while describing something no one has ever disputed. The band's best writing earns its abstractions by anchoring them to something specific — a place, a texture, a moment tight enough that the generalisation feels won. Here the abstraction is the whole point, and it floats. It doesn't cost anything to sing along to, which means it doesn't mean anything when you do.
None of this is a performance failing. The band plays it with the commitment they bring to everything, and live, crowd energy compensates for structural gaps in ways a studio recording cannot. This is precisely why songs like this survive in catalogues and setlists: a room full of people who already care will fill in what's missing. But strip that away and listen to the track on headphones, and the gaps are there.
The reason to name a song like this isn't score-settling. It's because the contrast is genuinely useful. The Living End's best songs work because their three-piece architecture is load-bearing — every element is doing essential work, the bass is both harmonic and percussive, the guitar has nowhere to hide, the drums are playing against an instrument that is already rhythmic. When all of that is calibrated right, the format creates a density that bigger bands can't replicate. When it's calibrated wrong, the same format has no capacity to hide the problem. "We're Not Getting Any Younger" is where the calibration slips, and what makes it instructive is that it slips in exactly the ways the format punishes most.
That's the argument. Others will disagree. The song has its defenders, and live footage exists that makes a reasonable case for it. But on the record, in the room of headphones and honest attention, it is the weakest thing on Modern Artillery, and probably the weakest thing in the core catalogue.
--- An unofficial fan archive. Not affiliated with, endorsed by, or connected to the band, its members, its management or its labels.